Change Management Matrix 5.2
The deadline for submitting (V0.84/0.85) was June 30, 2026.
You can still submit reports; they will be considered at a later date.
- Opening the audit tool: https://audit.econgood.org/und Log in ➡ Request ➡ Click on “Change management entries for version Matrix 5.2 V0.8) Direct link: Change notification
- Please check the table to see if the suggestion has already been submitted. This can happen especially if it concerns objective errors such as incorrect formulas, spelling mistakes, or similar.
If not, please click on the link “Create new change notification” (top left above the table). - Please fill out the form:
– Fields marked with * are mandatory.
– The more precisely the suggested improvement can be classified, the easier and faster the MDT can process the issue.
– Some fields contain a drop-down list for easy completion.
– Then there are text fields where the issue can be described in detail. Please make sure to describe the problem in detail, what can/should/must/may be improved, and please also include a suggestion for improvement. - Press the “Send” button at the bottom left. The MDT will receive the feedback and process it. You will be notified by email when the change has been implemented, or we will contact you if we have any questions.
The last 10 entries
Status des Eintrags: 304399, CH-M5.2-192, JiraID:
| Who (author of the change request) | marta.avesani@econgood.org |
|---|---|
| When (date of the change request) | 15. June 2026 |
| What change would you like to propose? | Arbeitsbuchtexte |
| Section | M5.2 Full Balance: B2.1 |
| Selected Topic | B2.1 |
| Look up matrix dyn(ID) | 261758 |
| What change is required (brief description) | [Feedback from Italian consultant after pilot with company] Indicator "(If_fromExperienced) Risk analysis for the next reporting period with regard to the expected economic, ecological, and social risks for the organisation and its stakeholders." is clear, and it is also clear, therefore, why a risk analysis is needed. In the guidelines risk analysis is defined but the world Stakeholder which do not appear before is taken into account. Also, the definition of SH analysis appears. It is not clear why SH analysis is there, if there is a correspondent indicator about it. If it is requested a Sh risk analysis or an economic, social and ecological risk analysis as written in the initial indicator." |
| What specific change is proposed (detailed description) | The logic flow in the guideline linking SH map, risk analysis and financial planning should be improved. Not clear at all. Not easy for micro-small organisations and for non-profit ones. |
| Change ID | CH-M5.2-192 |
| Entry | neu |
Tabulator Bearbeitung ermöglichen.
Liste -display-frm-data id=”100588″-
11.07.2026, 18:57
