Change Management Matrix 5.2
The deadline for submitting (V0.84/0.85) was June 30, 2026.
You can still submit reports; they will be considered at a later date.
- Opening the audit tool: https://audit.econgood.org/und Log in ➡ Request ➡ Click on “Change management entries for version Matrix 5.2 V0.8) Direct link: Change notification
- Please check the table to see if the suggestion has already been submitted. This can happen especially if it concerns objective errors such as incorrect formulas, spelling mistakes, or similar.
If not, please click on the link “Create new change notification” (top left above the table). - Please fill out the form:
– Fields marked with * are mandatory.
– The more precisely the suggested improvement can be classified, the easier and faster the MDT can process the issue.
– Some fields contain a drop-down list for easy completion.
– Then there are text fields where the issue can be described in detail. Please make sure to describe the problem in detail, what can/should/must/may be improved, and please also include a suggestion for improvement. - Press the “Send” button at the bottom left. The MDT will receive the feedback and process it. You will be notified by email when the change has been implemented, or we will contact you if we have any questions.
The last 10 entries
Status des Eintrags: 304389, CH-M5.2-185, JiraID:
| Who (author of the change request) | claudia.schleicher@econgood.org |
|---|---|
| When (date of the change request) | 14. June 2026 |
| What change would you like to propose? | Text einer Bewertungsstufe |
| Section | M5.2 Full Balance: E2.3 |
| Selected Topic | E2.3 |
| Look up matrix dyn(ID) | 261758 |
| Matrix version | M5.2V |
| What change is required (brief description) | Es fehlen große Teile des Bewertungsstufen-Texts in der deutschen Berichtsvorlage: deutsche Vorlage: "Bewertungsstufen Die Organisation wurde im Berichtsjahr wegen Korruption oder Interessenkonflikten verurteilt oder mit einer Geldstrafe belegt." Dahingehend: englische Vorlage: "Levels of evaluation The evaluation focuses on those measures aimed at preventing or dealing with corruption. For all shortcomings listed below, 50 points should be deducted (up to a maximum of minus 200): The organisation has been convicted or fined for corruption or conflicts of interest in the reporting year.Lack of transparency: non-disclosure of donations to political parties, non-inclusion in the Lobbying Register, or non-disclosure of conflicts of interest. Lack of awareness raising or setting a good example by management with regard to corruption risks: no code of conduct, no training or education in critical areas, or no awareness of sanctions in the case of misconduct. Insufficient measures to prevent, detect, or address corruption: no opportunities to report corruption, no protection given to whistleblowers, no separation of duties, or no two-person oversight principle. Lack of contractual clauses to prevent corruption in work, supplier, or client contracts." |
| What specific change is proposed (detailed description) | Vollständige Übersetzung der englischen Vorlage ins Deutsche für die deutsche Berichtsvorlage. |
| Change ID | CH-M5.2-185 |
| Entry | neu |
Tabulator Bearbeitung ermöglichen.
Liste -display-frm-data id=”100588″-
11.07.2026, 18:57
