Change Management Matrix 5.2
The deadline for submitting (V0.84/0.85) was June 30, 2026.
You can still submit reports; they will be considered at a later date.
- Opening the audit tool: https://audit.econgood.org/und Log in ➡ Request ➡ Click on “Change management entries for version Matrix 5.2 V0.8) Direct link: Change notification
- Please check the table to see if the suggestion has already been submitted. This can happen especially if it concerns objective errors such as incorrect formulas, spelling mistakes, or similar.
If not, please click on the link “Create new change notification” (top left above the table). - Please fill out the form:
– Fields marked with * are mandatory.
– The more precisely the suggested improvement can be classified, the easier and faster the MDT can process the issue.
– Some fields contain a drop-down list for easy completion.
– Then there are text fields where the issue can be described in detail. Please make sure to describe the problem in detail, what can/should/must/may be improved, and please also include a suggestion for improvement. - Press the “Send” button at the bottom left. The MDT will receive the feedback and process it. You will be notified by email when the change has been implemented, or we will contact you if we have any questions.
The last 10 entries
Status des Eintrags: 305352, CH-M5.2-350, JiraID:
| Who (author of the change request) | claudia.schleicher@econgood.org |
|---|---|
| When (date of the change request) | 4. July 2026 |
| What change would you like to propose? | Konkrete Berichtsfrage |
| Section | M5.2 Full Balance: E2.2 |
| Selected Topic | E2.2 |
| Look up matrix dyn(ID) | 261758 |
| Matrix version | M5.2V |
| Matrix Field | E2.2 |
| What change is required (brief description) | Die folgende Frage passt nicht zum Feld und Aspekt -> gehört bestenfalls zu E2.1, würde dort aber auch keinen Mehrwert stiften "(IfApplicable) Wurde ein eigenes Budget speziell für soziale Vorhaben vorgesehen? (siehe positiver Aspekt: wirksame Beiträge zur Stärkung der Gesellschaft)" Falls es Euch aber um die klare Abgrenzung zwischen freiwilligen Beiträgen und korruptiven Einflussnahmen geht, dann sollte man die Frage anders stellen. |
| What specific change is proposed (detailed description) | ENTWEDER: die Frage ersatzlos streichen (und auch nicht in E2.1 aufnehmen) ODER: die Frage ersetzen durch: "(May) Wie stellt die Organisation sicher, dass freiwillige Beiträge sich sauber von korruptiven Zwecken abgrenzen?" |
| Change ID | CH-M5.2-350 |
| Entry | neu |
Tabulator Bearbeitung ermöglichen.
Liste -display-frm-data id=”100588″-
11.07.2026, 20:57